About
We find claims your pending applications can still support, before the window closes.
When a competitor launches a product, Patentative checks whether a pending US patent family can still support claims covering it. We cite the as-filed paragraphs that may support those claims, draft 1–3 example claims, and flag the continuation deadline under 35 U.S.C. §120. You get a written report by email within 48 hours, prepared for review by your registered patent practitioner.
Why it exists
A patent family stays open while any member is pending. A continuation can take new claims, as long as the original specification supports them. It must be filed on or before the day the parent issues (MPEP 211.01(b)). How the deadline works.
Competitors often launch products that use features a pending specification describes but does not claim. Claiming them is legitimate: there is “nothing improper” in amending or adding claims to cover a competitor’s product (Kingsdown v. Hollister, Fed. Cir. 1988). The limit is written description. What the specification must show.
In small and mid-size prosecution firms, finding these is usually manual and occasional: someone happens to notice a product. Often that is after the parent has issued, when the window has closed.
Timing now costs money too. Since Jan 19, 2025, a continuation filed more than 6 years after the earliest benefit date carries a $2,700 fee for a large entity, rising to $4,000 after 9 years (37 CFR 1.17(w)). The surcharge explained.
How we work
- Public USPTO data
- Family status, continuity and documents come from the USPTO Open Data Portal.
- The as-filed specification
- Support is checked against the specification as filed, by paragraph number, not against a summary or the claims.
- Every citation checked
- Each cited paragraph is matched against the as-filed text. Reviews are prepared with software and checked by a person before they are sent.
- Written report within 48 hours
- You receive the report by email. Everything stays in writing.
- No calls
- No demos, no sales calls, no meetings. Questions are answered by email.
- Published information only
- We ask only for published application or patent numbers and public product links. Anything unpublished is deleted unread.
What we are not
Patentative is not a law firm
Principles
- Verifiable sources
- Every statement in a report points to a paragraph, a USPTO record or a public product page you can open yourself.
- Honest outcomes
- “No strong support found” is a valid result, and we say so plainly. Weak support is labelled weak.
- Quotes before work
- The first reviews are free. After that, we quote by email before any work starts. Contact us.
Data and methods
The step-by-step method, from product launch to support check, cited claims and deadline, is on How a review works. To check a family yourself, use the free continuation window checker.
Contact
Questions about a family, a launch or how we work? We reply by email.
Have a pending family and a competitor product in mind?
Send us the application number and a link to the product. We check whether the as-filed specification may support claims covering it, and reply by email within 48 hours. The first reviews are free.